<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ref="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/reference/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.sclbc.org/caucus-blog/rss.rdf">
		<title>Caucus Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.sclbc.org/caucus-blog/index.php</link>
		<description><![CDATA[No Footer]]></description>
		<items>
			<rdf:Seq>
				<rdf:li resource="http://www.sclbc.org/caucus-blog/index.php?entry=entry110126-122804" />
			</rdf:Seq>
		</items>
	</channel>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.sclbc.org/caucus-blog/index.php?entry=entry110126-122804">
		<title>Voter ID Bill debate</title>
		<link>http://www.sclbc.org/caucus-blog/index.php?entry=entry110126-122804</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Today on the SC House floor, Voter ID is up for debate.  There are several issues under consideration.<br /><br />1. Voters must produce approved photo identification in order to vote.<br /><br />2. Absentee ballot requests can only be made by qualified electors and not by an authorized representative.  <i>Ex. A nursing home resident, person in the hospital, college students studying away, and etc., would have to call themselves to request ballot. A family member could not assist with the request.</i> <br /><br />3. Absentee voting can only be via paper ballot and will not be allowed on electronic machines.<br /><br />(Please see the newsletter for the complete Bill.)<br /><br />What is your thought on this and what affect would it have on the citizens of SC? <br /><br />]]></description>
	</item>
</rdf:RDF>

